Fiserv
Thoughts & Comments
Goodbye, Citigroup
In the end, the attributes that were supposed to make the company great were what did it in, instead

Vernon Hill  ( about me )
Posted 11/21/2008
bankstocks.com
vhill@bankstocks.com

The end is nigh for yet another great American company: Citigroup, once the greatest U.S. financial institution of them all. 

As Tom Brown and I have noted many times, the whole idea behind Citigroup was flawed from the start. Unbeatable scale in financial services? Forget it. We now see the good Citi's size has done for investors: the company has an incoherent, unworkable business model. It is run by a senior management team that's largely unproven, with scant experience operating a large financial institution. And the company's risk controls (if the past few years are any evidence) are hopelessly inadequate to the task.  

While the conventional wisdom says Citi is too big to fail, the reality is it's too big to manage. As a result, the company has become a publicly traded incarnation of Murphy's Law: anything that can go wrong almost certainly will-and probably sooner rather than later. And $25 billion in TARP money isn't going to do much to turn things around.

As we discussed when WaMu finally hit the wall, once problems reach this magnitude there is no solution. 

Citibank in its present form cannot, and almost certainly will not, continue to exist.

What do you think? Let me know!


  Add your comment

 

 

Vegasjoe57 Posted On 11/23/2008 5:05:22 PM

Good thing they didn't get Wachovia! But, did Wells have to pay them any cash to go away?

newfie1 Posted On 11/24/2008 9:04:12 AM

Wasn't Mr. Brown advocating that Citi would be worth more by splitting it up into several units? Doubt that would've prevented anything. Rather than saying you thought the company was worth a lot less, you argued why it was actually worth *more*. I would really be careful about throwing around the I-told-you-so's.
Fiserv
Ad for Bankstocks
 

     Bankstocks.com is a public web site operated by individuals who also operate investment advisory firms that serve as investment advisers to hedge funds (the "Firms"). Some articles are authored by employees of the Firms while others are authored by third parties. Under no circumstances does any article posted on Bankstocks.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. This article is intended to provide insight into the financial services industry and is not a solicitation of any kind. The Firms do not vouch for the accuracy of any information contained in any article posted herein and the views expressed in any article herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Firms. The Firms buy and sell securities on behalf of their fund investors and may do so, before and after any particular article herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article posted herein. The Firms’ appraisal of a company's prospects is only one factor that affects the Firms’ decision whether to buy or sell shares in that company. Other factors might include, but are not limited to, the presence of mandatory limits on individual positions, decisions regarding portfolio exposures, and general market conditions, and liquidity needs. As such, there may not always be consistency between the views expressed in this article and the Firms’ trading on behalf of their fund investors. There may be conflicts between the content posted on Bankstocks.com and the interests of the Firms. For an explanation of these conflicts, including an explanation of our trading policy, and how we resolve them, click here.

Neither the authors nor any Bankstocks.com team members can provide investment advice or respond to individual requests for recommendations. However, we encourage your feedback and welcome your comments on any of the articles on this site. Neither the authors nor Bankstocks.com has undertaken any responsibility to update any portion of this article in response to events which may transpire subsequent to its original publication date.