Fiserv
 
Posted 07/22/2010 By Matt Stichnoth

IT TURNS OUT ELIZABETH WARREN'S BAD FAITH EXTENDED TO THE HEALTH CARE DEBATE, TOO

One more reason to expect that, should she be appointed head of the CFPB, Elizabeth Warren would be less a disinterested regulator than she would be a nakedly partisan hack: she obfuscates the data in studies she conducts, in order to arrive at a pre-determined, politically correct conclusion. That’s what happened last year, at any rate, when, in the midst of the healthcare debate, Warren and colleagues miraculously produced a paper that found that soaring medical expenses accounted for fully 70% of bankruptcy filings, up from 50% in 2001. The Atlantic’s Megan McArdle ain’t buying it:

What Warren et. al. neglect to mention is that bankruptcies fell between 2001 and 2007 [because of the more creditor-friendly bankruptcy law passed in 2005].  In fact, they were cut in half.  Going by the numbers Warren et. al. provide, medical bankruptcies actually fell by almost 220,000 between 2001 and 2007, a fact that they not only fail to mention, but deliberately obscure.

Are Warren, et. al. unaware that bankruptcies fell by half?  No bankruptcy analyst could possibly be unaware of this fact; it has been the most talked-about phenomenon in the bankruptcy area since the 2005 law was passed. 
 

So medical bankruptcies weren’t zooming, as Warren and her co-authors wanted people to believe in order to convince them to support health are reform. The opposite was happening. The absolute number of medical bankruptcies was falling.

If Liz Warren wants to play dilettante health researcher and put out bogus studies to support her partisan viewpoints, that’s fine. (Actually, it’s not fine. But somehow her paper got peer-reviewed and published, anyway.) But hijinx like that aren’t evidence of the kind of temperament one expects to see in an effective regulator. Should Elizabeth Warren be appointed head of the CFPB, she can be counted on to stick it to the banking industry regardless of the merits of the issue at hand, and bend over backwards for the consumer lobby. In the end, that won’t be good for the banks, or consumers, or the economy as a whole. . . .


12:40 PM  
   Add your comment

 

 
Fiserv
Ad for Bankstocks
 

     Bankstocks.com is a public web site operated by individuals who also operate investment advisory firms that serve as investment advisers to hedge funds (the "Firms"). Some articles are authored by employees of the Firms while others are authored by third parties. Under no circumstances does any article posted on Bankstocks.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. This article is intended to provide insight into the financial services industry and is not a solicitation of any kind. The Firms do not vouch for the accuracy of any information contained in any article posted herein and the views expressed in any article herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Firms. The Firms buy and sell securities on behalf of their fund investors and may do so, before and after any particular article herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article posted herein. The Firms’ appraisal of a company's prospects is only one factor that affects the Firms’ decision whether to buy or sell shares in that company. Other factors might include, but are not limited to, the presence of mandatory limits on individual positions, decisions regarding portfolio exposures, and general market conditions, and liquidity needs. As such, there may not always be consistency between the views expressed in this article and the Firms’ trading on behalf of their fund investors. There may be conflicts between the content posted on Bankstocks.com and the interests of the Firms. For an explanation of these conflicts, including an explanation of our trading policy, and how we resolve them, click here.

Neither the authors nor any Bankstocks.com team members can provide investment advice or respond to individual requests for recommendations. However, we encourage your feedback and welcome your comments on any of the articles on this site. Neither the authors nor Bankstocks.com has undertaken any responsibility to update any portion of this article in response to events which may transpire subsequent to its original publication date.