Fiserv
 
Posted 08/05/2008 By Matt Stichnoth

NYT SCOOP: DICK SYRON NOT CLAIRVOYANT!

So somehow Dick Syron should have been able to foresee the housing crackup because his chief risk officer wrote him a memo in 2004? A few thoughts:

1. The memo was written in 2004. By virtually all accounts, subprime lending standards didn’t start to become imprudent until late 2005 at the earliest. So, literally, the dire events Andrukonis warned of never came to pass. Why should he take a victory lap now?

2.
Too many blind sources! The Times says it spoke with “more than two dozen current and former high-ranking executives and others”—virtually all of whom insisted on anonymity. Helpful! If Syron’s judgments were as manifestly awful as the Times implies, some of those people would likely have been willing to speak on the record. 

3. More than most companies, the GSEs have to deal with key constituencies, particularly the federal government, that carry a lot of weight and whose interest can occasionally be at odds with shareholders’. The Times’s Charles Duhigg implicitly slams Freddie for putting shareholders at risk by taking on too much leverage and growing too fast. But it wasn’t too long ago, recall, that the government lifted capital restrictions on the company so it could grow even faster. It’s easy to fault Syron in retrospect. It wasn’t so easy at the time he was making the decisions he made.

4. In his and Syron’s defense, Daniel Mudd makes an obvious point: “You’ve got the worst housing crisis in U.S. recorded history, and we’re the largest housing finance company in the country, so when one goes down, the other goes with it.” Duh!

5. As
Tanta points out at CalculatedRisk, Syron’s resume is a lot longer and more relevant to the job than Duhigg discloses.

6. I did like this bit of candor from Syron himself, though:  “If I had better foresight, maybe I could have improved things a little bit. But frankly, if I had perfect foresight, I would never have taken this job in the first place.” I can only imagine.

Bonus tidbit: Freddie is really considering Alan Schwartz as Syron’s replacement?

More: It turns out the reason Andrukonis left Freddie to teach school is that he was canned, Freddie says in its response. Also, no one seeme to have a copy of the memo he says he wrote.  


10:39 AM  
   Add your comment

 

 
Fiserv
Ad for Bankstocks
 

     Bankstocks.com is a public web site operated by individuals who also operate investment advisory firms that serve as investment advisers to hedge funds (the "Firms"). Some articles are authored by employees of the Firms while others are authored by third parties. Under no circumstances does any article posted on Bankstocks.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. This article is intended to provide insight into the financial services industry and is not a solicitation of any kind. The Firms do not vouch for the accuracy of any information contained in any article posted herein and the views expressed in any article herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Firms. The Firms buy and sell securities on behalf of their fund investors and may do so, before and after any particular article herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article posted herein. The Firms’ appraisal of a company's prospects is only one factor that affects the Firms’ decision whether to buy or sell shares in that company. Other factors might include, but are not limited to, the presence of mandatory limits on individual positions, decisions regarding portfolio exposures, and general market conditions, and liquidity needs. As such, there may not always be consistency between the views expressed in this article and the Firms’ trading on behalf of their fund investors. There may be conflicts between the content posted on Bankstocks.com and the interests of the Firms. For an explanation of these conflicts, including an explanation of our trading policy, and how we resolve them, click here.

Neither the authors nor any Bankstocks.com team members can provide investment advice or respond to individual requests for recommendations. However, we encourage your feedback and welcome your comments on any of the articles on this site. Neither the authors nor Bankstocks.com has undertaken any responsibility to update any portion of this article in response to events which may transpire subsequent to its original publication date.